A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Periods article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have Long lasting ecological implications, specially in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their see, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o during a storm to photograph the location Irish Times, an image that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became Just about the most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and ailments connected to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to planning legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for your problem that numerous observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.